Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38016

in Cordova, TennesseePopulation 44,136

55.48/ 100

Ranked #8,897 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #40 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 6.5%)

Ranked #12 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.8%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

96 intersections/sq mi

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

36.2%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 38016, one of several in Cordova, Tennessee comes out in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,897th) and the top 6.5% of Tennessee (40th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and walkability stands in the top 11.0% nationally. By contrast, distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 7.1% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 11.5% nationally. Homeownership sits in the bottom 11.8% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the top 13.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 38002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.7 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.7 years — 4.9 years above them.

    Ranked #167 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.4–26.4
High blood pressure among adults37.3%33.9–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.4–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Depression among adults24.5%21.4–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.0–38.8
Obesity among adults35.8%31.1–40.4
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.5–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%8.1–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.2%71.1–76.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.8–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.1–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.8–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%58.6–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%74.3–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.6–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.8–24.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%35.1–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.8–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.9–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.4–16.6
Any disability among adults30.3%27.0–33.6
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate54.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population9.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$76,569$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$282,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,595$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured