Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37870

in Speedwell, TennesseePopulation 4,385

34.06/ 100

Ranked #29,711 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.4%)

Ranked #525 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

67.1%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.6%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.8%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Speedwell, Tennessee (ZIP 37870) ranks in the bottom 7.4% nationally (29,711th) and the bottom 14.8% of Tennessee (525th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled mammography registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 6.8% nationally, high cholesterol lies in the top 4.6% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 6.5% nationally, modeled hearing disability is in the top 7.5% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 9.8% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 37724, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.7%36.6–42.9
High blood pressure among adults47.6%43.9–51.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.9–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Depression among adults30.2%26.8–33.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%15.8–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.9%41.0–48.7
Obesity among adults43.6%37.0–50.3
Stroke among adults5.2%4.8–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.4%21.7–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.1–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%78.0–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.9–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%57.7–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.8%52.4–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.1%59.5–73.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%10.8–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.7%19.8–25.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%28.6–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.0–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%25.3–31.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.2–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%17.3–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.8–22.1
Any disability among adults43.4%39.2–47.5
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.2–12.6
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.8–13.6
Mobility disability among adults23.0%20.4–25.7
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)21.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription75.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households67.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$55,516$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$126,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$933$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured