Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37771

in Lenoir City, TennesseePopulation 18,042

41.63/ 100

Ranked #25,544 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #276 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #42 of 72 Knoxville, TN ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

35 per million

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.1 mi

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

72.2%

in the top 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

45.6%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 37771, one of several in Lenoir City, Tennessee lands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,544th) and the top 45% of Tennessee (276th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 8.1% nationally. Mental-health providers lies in the top 8.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lands in the bottom 11.9% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 12.2% nationally, and dental providers is in the top 13.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 9.1% nationally, distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 12.6% nationally. PFOS in drinking water rests in the top 13.9% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 37763, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Knoxville, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.1 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $66,938 predicts 78.5 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,535 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.5–36.1
High blood pressure among adults41.6%37.4–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Depression among adults29.1%25.3–32.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.6–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%35.9–44.3
Obesity among adults39.2%31.8–46.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%13.9–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.9–17.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.8–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.9–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.3%57.4–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.6%50.9–58.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%65.9–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%17.1–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.0%25.6–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%32.9–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.9%23.1–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.8–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.1–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.2–21.4
Any disability among adults38.8%34.5–43.2
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.1–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6421.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate71.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population8.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+21.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$66,938$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$279,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,000$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured