ZIP code
37730
in Eagan, TennesseePopulation 33
32.38/ 100
Ranked #30,213 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.8%)
Ranked #562 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Colon-cancer screening
43.7%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
91.5%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Mammography
65.4%
in the bottom 3.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Obesity
47.1%
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
21.6%
in the top 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS4thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
Eagan, Tennessee (ZIP 37730), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 5.8% nationally (30,213th) and the bottom 8.8% of Tennessee (562nd).
The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 0.6% nationally, mammography settles in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and obesity registers in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 4.6% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled tree cover lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden is at the national minimum. Poverty resides at the national minimum, and homeownership rests at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally.
Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 37729, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 37%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 1.0%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 9%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 40%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 80%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 54%
8%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 30%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 2%
11%
Disability
healthier than 19%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
37715
Tennesseeshares a border
Score 28.53
Closest healthier
37729
Tennesseeshares a border
Score 35.46
Similar health profile
63767
Missouri98% similar profile
Score 39.93
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.4% | 28.6–36.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 46.0% | 40.9–51.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.0% | 7.1–9.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.7% | 8.5–11.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.9% | 8.4–11.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.5% | 9.9–15.7 |
| Depression among adults | 28.2% | 24.1–32.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.2% | 13.6–19.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.1% | 36.3–45.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 47.1% | 38.1–56.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 3.9–5.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 19.3% | 15.8–23.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 17.6% | 10.8–25.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 72.9% | 69.1–76.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 73.8% | 69.0–78.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.0% | 77.3–86.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 43.7% | 38.6–48.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 43.5% | 39.4–47.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 65.4% | 56.0–74.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.0% | 13.7–20.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 29.2% | 21.8–36.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.4% | 26.1–40.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.9% | 34.5–49.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.3% | 24.0–38.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.7% | 17.2–23.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.5% | 15.2–22.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 21.6% | 17.1–26.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.9% | 35.7–50.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.7–13.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.7% | 9.2–14.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.0% | 15.9–24.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.5–7.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.8–9.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 24.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 12.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608 |
| Population 65+ | 48.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617 |
| Median age | 49.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615 |
| Median household income | $44,688 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594 |
| Median home value | $110,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $908 ($659–$1,523) n=516 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured