Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37620

in Bristol, TennesseePopulation 38,494

42.41/ 100

Ranked #24,897 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #253 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #17 of 30 Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Park land

34.5%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

88.5 days/year

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bristol, Tennessee (ZIP 37620) ranks in the bottom 22% nationally (24,897th) and the top 41% of Tennessee (253rd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: park land registers in the top 4.0% nationally, and physicians lies in the top 6.4% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outpatient lies in the top 10.9% nationally, modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 10.6% nationally, and modeled tree cover registers in the top 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the top 8.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 24201, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.8 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $56,128 predicts 77.8 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,167 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%33.3–39.1
High blood pressure among adults42.0%38.7–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.5–11.6
Depression among adults31.0%27.6–34.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.5–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.9–42.8
Obesity among adults38.0%33.3–42.9
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.0–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.8–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.2–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.3–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.7–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%60.2–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%55.8–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.0–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.5–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%17.4–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%25.9–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%33.2–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.1%22.5–27.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.7–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.5–20.3
Any disability among adults39.1%35.5–42.8
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.6
Mobility disability among adults19.4%17.4–21.5
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6415.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)9.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate72.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$56,128$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$188,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$871$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.8 yr ± 0.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.41 years of 74.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured