Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37376

in Sherwood, TennesseePopulation 361

47.68/ 100

Ranked #19,352 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #134 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

64.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

91.5%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

50%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

42.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

39.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.2%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.9%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

13.3 mi

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70.5%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sherwood, Tennessee (ZIP 37376), overall, ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,352nd) and the top 22% of Tennessee (134th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: households without a vehicle is in the top 0.7% nationally, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and poverty lands in the top 2.6% nationally. Walkability lies in the bottom 3.6% nationally, homeownership stands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 7.2% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled tree cover registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the bottom 10.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, households without a vehicle runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 37375, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.9%34.0–42.1
High blood pressure among adults44.1%39.5–48.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.5–12.9
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.1–11.2
Depression among adults29.4%25.4–33.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.7–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.9%39.4–48.6
Obesity among adults35.1%27.9–42.8
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.0–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.2–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.1–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%78.5–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.4–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%65.9–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.0–68.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.0–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%10.3–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%12.8–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%21.4–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%30.4–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%17.7–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.8–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.4–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.5–16.8
Any disability among adults35.8%31.0–40.7
Hearing disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.3
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.4–21.0
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate42.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6446.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle64.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription50.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate39.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+2.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age46.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$213,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 2.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.03 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured