Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37148

in Portland, TennesseePopulation 26,274

42.10/ 100

Ranked #25,128 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #264 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #88 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

3.2%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Portland, Tennessee (ZIP 37148), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 22% nationally (25,128th) and the top 43% of Tennessee (264th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 17% nationally. On the other hand, modeled nitrate lands in the top 5.0% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 12.1% nationally, and obesity lands in the top 10.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 21% nationally, and mammography lands in the bottom 20% nationally. Modeled pfas rests in the top 22% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 37022, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $81,633 predicts 79.3 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,531 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.3–35.7
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.0–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Depression among adults31.8%28.0–36.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.5–43.7
Obesity among adults42.6%35.8–49.7
Stroke among adults3.6%3.4–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%14.0–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.9–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.9%72.0–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%72.8–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%56.8–66.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.1–60.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%62.5–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.5–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%17.6–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.6–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.5–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.6%21.1–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%19.0–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.5–21.3
Any disability among adults37.7%33.7–41.9
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.7–18.3
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6415.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate75.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households47.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$81,633$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$295,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,122$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured