Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36280

in Woodland, AlabamaPopulation 4,576

44.61/ 100

Ranked #22,798 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #257 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

45.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.26%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

11.9 mi

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Woodland, Alabama (ZIP 36280) lands in the bottom 29% nationally (22,798th) and the top 42% of Alabama (257th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and arsenic lands in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 3.8% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 11.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests in the top 14.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat registers in the top 14.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides in the top 16% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the top 16% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 36278, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 78.5; chronic-disease standing 19.4 — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,804 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.8–38.2
High blood pressure among adults45.2%40.7–49.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
Depression among adults25.4%21.7–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.3–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.3%40.7–50.0
Obesity among adults36.9%29.0–45.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%13.9–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.9–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.9–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.1–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.0–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.0–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.0%53.0–61.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%64.5–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.6–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%23.6–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%28.8–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.7%21.1–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%13.8–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%14.8–19.4
Any disability among adults39.5%34.3–44.5
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.0–11.9
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.2–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%19.6–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.2–20.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.2–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.8–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.7–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.8–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)16.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription85.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households64.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$72,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$201,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$804$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured