ZIP code
35755
in Langston, AlabamaPopulation 466
41.78/ 100
Ranked #25,410 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranked #338 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 45%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
48.8%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
50.7%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
52.8%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.9%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.6%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
29%
in the top 7.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
11.0%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
18%
in the top 8.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST72ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.12%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS9thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS10thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›The read
Langston, Alabama (ZIP 35755) ranks in the bottom 21% nationally (25,410th) and the bottom 45% of Alabama (338th).
Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled high cholesterol registers in the top 0.6% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 2.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 3.5% nationally, modeled hearing disability registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease lies in the top 6.0% nationally. Poverty is in the top 7.5% nationally, unemployment registers in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled diabetes lies in the top 8.1% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
For context, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 35769, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 78%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 49%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 40%
11%
Disability
healthier than 18%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 5%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 67%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 75%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 66%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 43%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 55%
14%
Disability
healthier than 46%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
35769
Alabamashares a border
Score 49.02
Closest healthier
35976
Alabamashares a border
Score 46.26
Similar health profile
36556
Alabama98% similar profile
Score 37.89
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.6% | 36.3–42.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 50.7% | 46.9–54.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.0% | 11.1–13.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.8% | 8.7–10.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–12.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.5% | 9.8–13.3 |
| Depression among adults | 24.3% | 21.4–27.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.0% | 15.8–20.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 48.8% | 45.2–52.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.3% | 32.6–44.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.1% | 4.6–5.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.1% | 11.9–16.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.0% | 7.2–11.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.1% | 80.9–85.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.3% | 79.7–84.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.2% | 87.8–90.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.9% | 65.7–73.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.8% | 55.3–61.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.3% | 68.7–80.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.6% | 10.8–14.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.0% | 15.3–20.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.6% | 27.1–36.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.8% | 32.5–42.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 25.9% | 22.5–29.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.0% | 14.2–17.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.2% | 15.2–19.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.7% | 13.8–17.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 41.9% | 37.3–46.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.9% | 10.6–13.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.5% | 18.7–24.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.6–6.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.4–7.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.3% | 20.1–26.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.3% | 12.7–18.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.8% | 8.8–13.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 8.4–11.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 6.5–8.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.5% | 28.4–37.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–7.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 29.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 31.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 13.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 11.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622 |
| Broadband subscription | 85.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 31.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622 |
| Homeownership rate | 73.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.6% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628 |
| Single-parent households | 59.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617 |
| Population 65+ | 32.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628 |
| Median age | 56.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621 |
| Median household income | $41,964 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587 |
| Median home value | $350,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568 |
| Median gross rent | $911 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $856 ($625–$1,266) n=503 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.2 yr ± 1.03 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 74.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured