Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34465

in Beverly Hills, FloridaPopulation 18,879

48.39/ 100

Ranked #18,429 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #640 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #5 of 13 Homosassa Springs, FL ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

179.5 days/year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.9%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.15%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

49.3 mi

in the top 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

1.2%

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Beverly Hills, Florida (ZIP 34465), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,429th) and the bottom 34% of Florida (640th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled humid heat resides in the top 1.8% nationally, high cholesterol sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the top 6.0% nationally, stroke sits in the top 7.8% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 12.2% nationally. Better still, modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and transportation noise sits in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 11.1% nationally, and modeled colon screening resides in the top 8.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 34433, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Homosassa Springs, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $54,869 predicts 77.7 years — 1.4 years below.

    Ranked #1,775 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 10.1 — 82 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #428 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.5%34.0–41.1
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.6–47.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.7%12.4–14.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults11.4%10.2–12.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Depression among adults18.4%15.8–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.4–18.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.9%42.7–51.1
Obesity among adults32.5%27.0–38.5
Stroke among adults5.5%5.1–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.5–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.2–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.4%81.9–86.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.6–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.9–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.2–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.7%53.3–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%66.5–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.4–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.2–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%25.5–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.1–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.7%20.9–26.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.5–15.8
Any disability among adults38.7%34.5–42.8
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.4–12.9
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Mobility disability among adults21.3%18.8–23.8
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate81.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population6.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households68.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+37.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age57.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$54,869$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$256,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,227$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured