Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34139

in Everglades City, FloridaPopulation 243

54.27/ 100

Ranked #10,349 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #416 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #17 of 21 Naples-Marco Island, FL ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

228.7 days/year

in the top 0.02% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

99.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

61.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

31.9 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

24.6 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

25.9 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.2%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, Everglades City, Florida (ZIP 34139) comes out in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,349th) and the top 43% of Florida (416th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the top 2.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat settles in the top 0.02% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers in the top 0.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the top 1.1% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lands in the top 1.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 34114, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Naples-Marco Island, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.3–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.2%35.3–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.4%12.2–14.7
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Depression among adults17.0%14.4–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.1–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.8–46.7
Obesity among adults27.4%22.3–32.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.5–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.8–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.5–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.1%71.1–78.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%62.9–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%70.4–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.6–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%10.8–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.5–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.3%25.6–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.9–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Any disability among adults29.4%25.9–33.1
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.9–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6438.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)61.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate68.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households75.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$85,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$392,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,712$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 1.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.91 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured