Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34105

in Naples, FloridaPopulation 15,441

62.77/ 100

Ranked #3,093 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #109 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 11.2%)

Ranked #7 of 21 Naples-Marco Island, FL ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

23.9%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

59.1%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.1%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

88 mi

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.3%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.2%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.8%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.1%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 34105, one of several in Naples, Florida comes out in the top 9.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,093rd) and the top 11.2% of Florida (109th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally, modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 4.4% nationally. Recreation stands in the top 4.6% nationally, modeled colon screening lands in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. By contrast, floodplain exposure sits in the top 2.7% nationally.

In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 34102, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Naples-Marco Island, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.8–36.2
High blood pressure among adults39.0%35.4–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.5%14.2–16.9
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Depression among adults15.2%13.0–17.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%39.4–47.4
Obesity among adults23.9%19.4–28.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%5.0–7.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%8.3–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%82.1–86.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.6–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%90.9–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.3%71.3–78.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%67.0–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.0–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.9–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%17.4–24.0
Short sleep duration among adults27.1%22.8–31.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.2–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Any disability among adults28.2%24.7–31.7
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.3
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate70.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population21.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households74.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+47.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age62.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$92,214$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$594,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,170$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured