Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33146

in Coral Gables, FloridaPopulation 19,052

66.14/ 100

Ranked #1,567 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.9%)

Ranked #29 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 3.0%)

Ranked #17 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

8.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

23.4%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 33146, one of several in Coral Gables, Florida stands in the top 4.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,567th) and the top 3.0% of Florida (29th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: physicians rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and dental providers lands in the top 1.3% nationally. Mental-health providers settles in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled obesity lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and outpatient rests in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 2.0% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and transit rests in the top 3.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, physicians runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 33133, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 43.4; chronic-disease standing 98.4 (top 10%) — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,896 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
High blood pressure among adults23.4%20.8–26.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Depression among adults16.4%14.0–18.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.8%26.0–31.8
Obesity among adults23.5%19.4–27.8
Stroke among adults1.9%1.7–2.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.4%3.5–5.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.9%14.8–19.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.9%63.0–68.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%70.6–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults79.4%77.2–81.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.9–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.1%57.2–63.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%74.2–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.2–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.8–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%30.9–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.9–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.9–17.2
Any disability among adults25.6%22.6–28.9
Hearing disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Mobility disability among adults7.9%6.8–8.9
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)78.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate58.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population30.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age23.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$131,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$1,318,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,975$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured