Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33054

in Opa-locka, FloridaPopulation 31,055

39.82/ 100

Ranked #26,872 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #882 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranked #175 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

28.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

46.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

197.7 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,177 units

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

35.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

59%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Opa-locka, Florida (ZIP 33054) comes out in the bottom 16% nationally (26,872nd) and the bottom 9.5% of Florida (882nd).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled uninsured lies in the top 1.5% nationally, vision disability sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and transportation noise settles in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the top 0.6% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 4.1% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 3.0% nationally. More encouragingly, subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 1.0% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33014, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.3 ± 1.4 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.1 years — 3.9 years below them.

    Ranked #2,948 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%21.0–26.0
High blood pressure among adults40.7%37.3–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.1
Depression among adults14.7%12.5–17.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%16.9–20.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.5–38.3
Obesity among adults35.9%30.7–41.2
Stroke among adults5.2%4.8–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%21.8–29.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years28.2%25.4–30.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.8–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.7–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.9–84.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.8%53.3–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.6%39.4–45.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%66.1–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.5–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.8–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.6%36.4–44.8
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%40.5–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.8%28.0–33.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.8–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%17.2–21.0
Any disability among adults37.1%33.4–40.9
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.3–13.7
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.7–22.9
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Vision disability among adults11.7%10.7–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6434.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)24.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)7.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle13.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription77.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)59.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate48.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population40.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households30.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$45,710$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$335,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,474$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured