Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32713

in DeBary, FloridaPopulation 22,884

57.17/ 100

Ranked #7,112 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #277 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #4 of 30 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

84.4%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

184.3 days/year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

95.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

95.2%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31.4%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

5.3%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

DeBary, Florida (ZIP 32713), overall, ranks in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,112th) and the top 28% of Florida (277th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and radon resides in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Distance to an emergency room is in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 1.4% nationally. PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 6.4% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 6.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the top 9.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers in the top 16% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 32771, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.5%25.8–31.5
High blood pressure among adults37.6%34.1–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.4–12.4
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Depression among adults18.6%16.1–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.6–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%37.5–44.8
Obesity among adults30.3%25.6–35.5
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.6–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.4–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.1–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.2–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.9–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%66.1–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.9–66.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.7–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.0%18.8–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%27.9–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.7–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Any disability among adults30.3%26.9–33.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate87.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households61.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$88,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$349,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,751$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured