Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32503

in Pensacola, FloridaPopulation 33,559

55.14/ 100

Ranked #9,296 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #375 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #9 of 25 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

89.8%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89.8%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 32503, one of several in Pensacola, Florida ranks in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,296th) and the top 39% of Florida (375th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: physicians sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and dental providers rests in the top 6.6% nationally. Walkability is in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Elder services settles in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Against that, distance to a Superfund site resides at the national minimum, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 8.4% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 8.7% nationally. PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 9.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 32504, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $71,411 predicts 78.7 years — 1.8 years below.

    Ranked #2,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.5–27.8
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.4–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Depression among adults20.7%17.6–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.0–39.3
Obesity among adults33.3%27.9–39.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.0–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.3–12.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.3–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.7–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%82.1–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.0–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.2%56.7–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%71.0–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.8–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%19.9–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%30.1–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.9–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.1–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
Any disability among adults31.6%28.0–35.4
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Mobility disability among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6417.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle10.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate69.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$71,411$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$298,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,305$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.48 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured