Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31405

in Savannah, GeorgiaPopulation 40,764

49.45/ 100

Ranked #17,010 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #287 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #17 of 23 Savannah, GA ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

4.0%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

618 units

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

8.2%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.53 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 31405, one of several in Savannah, Georgia, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 47% nationally (17,010th) and the top 40% of Georgia (287th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, physicians rests in the top 2.9% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 3.4% nationally. Dental providers lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and outpatient rests in the top 7.1% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled disaster risk settles in the top 2.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds lands in the top 3.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 7.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 31322, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Savannah, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.8 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $65,710 predicts 78.4 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,625 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%22.3–27.5
High blood pressure among adults39.2%35.9–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Depression among adults19.1%16.4–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%31.5–38.6
Obesity among adults33.9%28.6–39.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%13.8–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.1%12.4–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%75.0–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.9–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.1–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.6–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.7–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%71.3–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.9–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.8–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%23.6–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.5%38.2–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.9–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
Any disability among adults31.6%28.0–35.2
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Mobility disability among adults14.8%13.1–16.4
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.5–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%19.7–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.9–21.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.7–19.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Loneliness among adults38.4%34.0–42.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.6–13.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6420.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle10.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate52.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population8.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age35.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$65,710$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$338,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,492$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured