Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31023

in Eastman, GeorgiaPopulation 13,964

41.62/ 100

Ranked #25,552 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #526 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.2%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

130.5 days/year

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

24.5 days/year

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 43% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US57th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Eastman, Georgia (ZIP 31023), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 20% nationally (25,552nd) and the bottom 26% of Georgia (526th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery lies in the top 6.7% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and physicians resides in the top 10.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled loneliness lands in the top 8.1% nationally, humid heat stands in the top 9.8% nationally, and self-care disability registers in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled diabetes settles in the top 11.4% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 31009, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $52,021 predicts 77.5 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 81.7; chronic-disease standing 18.4 — 63 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,495 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.4–33.9
High blood pressure among adults44.6%40.4–48.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
Depression among adults21.5%18.3–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%36.8–45.3
Obesity among adults40.5%33.0–48.4
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.4–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.4–16.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.7–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.2–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.8–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.0–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.9%48.1–55.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.5–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.0–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.6–21.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.4–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%33.2–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%23.7–29.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.3–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.8–19.6
Any disability among adults37.7%33.5–42.0
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.5
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.7–22.2
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.2–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.8–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.6%20.9–26.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.5%19.2–24.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%15.4–19.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Loneliness among adults38.2%33.2–43.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6421.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription79.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate67.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households54.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$52,021$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$133,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$735$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured