Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30518

in Buford, GeorgiaPopulation 57,912

57.80/ 100

Ranked #6,571 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #103 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 14.5%)

Ranked #71 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.8 per million

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.85 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

98.6 days/year

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 30518, one of several in Buford, Georgia ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,571st) and the top 14.5% of Georgia (103rd).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and recreation lands in the top 12.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Park land settles in the top 14.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 7.5% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 8.1% nationally, and loneliness rests in the top 12.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 13.8% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Close by, ZIP 30024, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.7 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $96,936 predicts 80.0 years — 1.2 years below.

    Ranked #1,557 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 27.9; chronic-disease standing 85.7 — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,202 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 38.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.7 ± 0.8 years.

    Ranked #1,644 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.0%18.8–23.3
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.7–34.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults17.7%15.3–20.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.2–39.8
Obesity among adults33.3%28.8–38.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.4–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.7–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.4–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.8–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.5–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%57.9–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%59.5–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%65.6–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.3–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%22.2–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%31.3–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%16.2–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.2–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%11.0–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.8–14.4
Any disability among adults25.8%23.1–28.8
Hearing disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.2
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.7–8.1
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%21.0–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%13.0–16.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.5–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Loneliness among adults37.1%33.0–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate75.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population22.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+11.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$96,936$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$411,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,735$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.43 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured