Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30449

in Oliver, GeorgiaPopulation 18

36.56/ 100

Ranked #28,724 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranked #635 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

22.8%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

18.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Oliver, Georgia (ZIP 30449) lands in the bottom 10.5% nationally (28,724th) and the bottom 10.7% of Georgia (635th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled diabetes is in the top 1.2% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the top 1.6% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and transportation noise stands in the top 3.0% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden lies at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and poverty sits at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription is at the national maximum.

A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 30446, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%27.8–35.3
High blood pressure among adults53.0%48.4–57.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.5–12.4
Depression among adults17.5%14.6–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.8%19.9–26.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.5–45.8
Obesity among adults46.8%38.2–55.6
Stroke among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.1%13.3–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%11.7–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.7–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.0–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.1–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%58.7–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.2%46.5–54.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.4–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.2–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.9%18.5–27.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.7%30.6–43.3
Short sleep duration among adults46.5%39.2–53.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.4%26.4–36.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.2–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%15.8–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%14.9–20.7
Any disability among adults38.4%32.7–44.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Independent living disability among adults12.4%10.3–14.5
Mobility disability among adults22.7%19.1–26.5
Self-care disability among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Vision disability among adults9.5%7.9–11.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.2%25.5–35.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%24.7–36.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.6%23.3–35.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.6%20.0–29.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.5–18.1
Loneliness among adults38.0%32.2–43.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.1%14.8–21.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6428.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate66.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households0.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 2.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.34 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured