Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30101

in Acworth, GeorgiaPopulation 62,593

60.68/ 100

Ranked #4,337 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.6%)

Ranked #66 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #51 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Park land

18.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.5%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$110,774

in the top 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

15.4%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 30101, one of several in Acworth, Georgia ranks in the top 13.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,337th) and the top 9.3% of Georgia (66th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: park land lies in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability sits in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and stroke rests in the bottom 12.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 6.6% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water settles in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30152, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.4 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.6%20.6–24.8
High blood pressure among adults31.9%29.3–34.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.0–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Depression among adults19.8%17.6–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%33.5–39.2
Obesity among adults30.8%27.2–34.8
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.9–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.5–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.4–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.8–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%87.2–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%61.9–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.4%64.0–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%68.4–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%14.0–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%18.4–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%33.3–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.9–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%14.2–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.7–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%11.0–13.3
Any disability among adults23.8%21.4–26.4
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.7–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%19.5–24.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Loneliness among adults34.9%31.6–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription93.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate79.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population11.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households46.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$110,774$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$412,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,788$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured