Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30012

in Conyers, GeorgiaPopulation 34,506

46.43/ 100

Ranked #20,835 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #374 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #181 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 12.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

2.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.8%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.1%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.2%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

13.9%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

13.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 30012, one of several in Conyers, Georgia stands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,835th) and the bottom 47% of Georgia (374th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: physicians settles in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 8.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and loneliness settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the top 7.6% nationally, uninsured lands in the top 7.4% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 9.0% nationally, industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 9.2% nationally, and transportation settles in the top 9.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 30013, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $66,153 predicts 78.4 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,849 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%23.5–29.6
High blood pressure among adults41.5%37.3–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Depression among adults19.0%16.1–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.0–41.2
Obesity among adults39.0%31.4–46.6
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.4%15.2–21.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.2%15.2–19.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.5–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.6–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.3–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%57.9–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.8%48.9–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%70.2–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.7–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.7–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%27.7–37.0
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%35.6–48.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.1–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.9–18.5
Any disability among adults34.3%30.2–38.5
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.7–11.9
Mobility disability among adults17.2%15.3–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%23.6–31.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.4%22.3–28.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.7%19.2–24.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%18.4–23.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.7–14.7
Loneliness among adults38.8%33.4–44.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6426.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate61.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population13.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+12.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$66,153$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$268,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,212$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured