ZIP code
29554
in Stuckey, South CarolinaPopulation 8,681
38.03/ 100
Ranked #27,989 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.8%)
Ranked #368 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 11.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
22%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.9%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.5%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
51%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.8%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
9.8%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
13.4%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
25.9%
in the top 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
31.2%
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
30.6%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Stuckey, South Carolina (ZIP 29554) stands in the bottom 12.8% nationally (27,989th) and the bottom 11.8% of South Carolina (368th).
The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled diabetes settles in the top 1.7% nationally, and self-care disability rests in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 2.3% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 3.8% nationally, vision disability lands in the top 5.3% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss rests in the top 6.2% nationally, fair or poor health lands in the top 6.3% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the top 5.7% nationally.
ZIP 29440, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 2.6% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 51%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 45%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 6%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 22%
11%
Disability
healthier than 5%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 31%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 44%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 6%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 26%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $55,100 predicts 77.7 years — 2.8 years below.
Ranked #3,836 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 97.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 4.8 (bottom 10%) — 93 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #60 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
29440
South Carolinashares a border
Score 49.47
Closest healthier
29527
South Carolinashares a border
Score 42.89
Similar health profile
28340
North Carolina99% similar profile
Score 32.85
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.5% | 32.0–37.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 51.0% | 47.9–54.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.6% | 7.9–9.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 10.1–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.9% | 9.2–10.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.2% | 11.1–13.4 |
| Depression among adults | 21.5% | 19.1–24.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 22.0% | 20.2–24.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.5% | 37.4–43.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.4% | 38.4–48.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.5% | 6.1–7.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 25.9% | 22.8–29.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.8% | 12.9–16.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.4% | 82.7–86.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.5% | 81.3–85.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.7% | 85.4–88.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.5% | 61.9–68.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 49.5% | 46.6–52.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.4% | 71.4–80.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.6% | 10.0–13.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.7% | 17.5–21.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.4% | 32.6–40.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.3% | 35.0–43.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.2% | 28.4–33.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.4% | 16.7–20.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.6% | 17.0–20.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.1% | 16.5–19.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.4% | 38.9–45.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.9% | 8.1–9.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.4% | 12.2–14.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.8% | 22.6–26.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.9% | 7.2–8.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.8% | 9.0–10.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.2% | 25.5–31.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 30.6% | 27.7–33.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 23.4% | 20.8–26.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.4% | 19.3–23.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 12.5–15.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.0% | 30.6–37.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 15.7% | 14.2–17.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 20.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 20.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 16.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 20.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 19.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410 |
| Homeownership rate | 75.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419 |
| Single-parent households | 48.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 22.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419 |
| Median age | 42.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415 |
| Median household income | $55,100 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384 |
| Median home value | $156,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383 |
| Median gross rent | $871 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $950 ($678–$1,545) n=343 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.9 yr ± 0.93 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured