Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29543

in Fork, South CarolinaPopulation 415

34.13/ 100

Ranked #29,692 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranked #402 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

8.0%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.7%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

29.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.3%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.6%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Fork, South Carolina (ZIP 29543) ranks in the bottom 7.5% nationally (29,692nd) and the bottom 3.6% of South Carolina (402nd).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled stroke sits in the top 0.4% nationally, and diabetes rests in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 0.5% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 1.7% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 3.3% nationally, independent living disability registers in the top 3.2% nationally, and hearing disability sits in the top 2.3% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 29536, just across the boundary. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 0.6% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.5%38.6–46.5
High blood pressure among adults55.3%50.9–59.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.5–13.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.6%13.5–18.0
Depression among adults22.0%18.7–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.9%21.9–27.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.6%41.9–51.3
Obesity among adults43.0%35.2–50.9
Stroke among adults8.0%7.2–9.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.2%26.5–36.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.8%11.8–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.2%85.2–89.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.9%80.9–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.3–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.1–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.7%45.9–53.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%65.7–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.1%9.0–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.5%17.3–23.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.0%32.5–43.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%28.6–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.6%29.5–38.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.1–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults21.0%18.4–23.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%15.6–20.4
Any disability among adults46.2%41.2–51.5
Hearing disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.3
Independent living disability among adults14.6%12.8–16.7
Mobility disability among adults29.6%26.0–33.3
Self-care disability among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Vision disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.6%21.9–30.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.7%22.6–31.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.0%16.7–23.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%13.8–18.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.5–13.9
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.9–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription82.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate95.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households88.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+54.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age65.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$55,658$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$84,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured