Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29320

in Arcadia, South CarolinaPopulation 603

40.04/ 100

Ranked #26,730 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #344 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #30 of 36 Spartanburg, SC ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

21.6%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

5.2%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

18.8%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

24.9%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.0%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

42%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Arcadia, South Carolina (ZIP 29320) ranks in the bottom 17% nationally (26,730th) and the bottom 18% of South Carolina (344th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled uninsured resides in the top 3.6% nationally, and loud transportation noise lands in the top 1.2% nationally. Crowded housing registers in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, unemployment is in the top 5.3% nationally, and homeownership stands in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 7.1% nationally. On the stronger side, lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 29301, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Spartanburg, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.3–28.3
High blood pressure among adults35.5%32.4–38.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.7–7.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.4–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.7–9.3
Depression among adults24.9%21.8–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.0–40.5
Obesity among adults39.3%34.5–44.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.9%16.8–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.6%17.9–25.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.1–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.7–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults81.1%78.3–83.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%56.2–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.7–55.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%69.0–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.1–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.2–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%28.3–36.6
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%35.7–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%22.2–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.1–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.0–22.0
Any disability among adults37.9%33.7–42.1
Hearing disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.6
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.0
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.5–19.2
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.7%25.0–32.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.7%21.8–30.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.3–22.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.2–13.8
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.6–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)9.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)13.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate42.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)18.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population13.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households14.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+6.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age34.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$54,353$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$168,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,637$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 1.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.80 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured