Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29070

in Leesville, South CarolinaPopulation 15,657

49.08/ 100

Ranked #17,541 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #169 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #26 of 47 Columbia, SC ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

0.22%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.6 mi

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

72%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Leesville, South Carolina (ZIP 29070), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 45% nationally (17,541st) and the top 41% of South Carolina (169th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 10.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband resides in the top 18% nationally, and modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 21% nationally. Working the other way, modeled nitrate settles in the top 7.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the top 12.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 16% nationally. Modeled humid heat sits in the top 16% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 16% nationally.

In everyday language, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 29036, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbia, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%29.4–34.5
High blood pressure among adults40.7%37.7–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.6
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%7.0–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%8.1–9.8
Depression among adults25.0%22.2–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.8–43.8
Obesity among adults38.1%33.7–42.5
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%12.4–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.8–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%79.0–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.6–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.8–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%65.0–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%56.4–62.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%66.7–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.5–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%26.2–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%32.3–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%20.0–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.3–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%14.0–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.6–16.4
Any disability among adults33.2%30.1–36.2
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Mobility disability among adults17.1%15.4–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.8–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.9–18.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.9–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.3–9.1
Loneliness among adults29.8%26.6–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription86.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate86.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households60.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$65,865$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$197,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$932$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured