Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28671

in Rutherford College, North CarolinaPopulation 375

55.16/ 100

Ranked #9,262 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #212 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #3 of 24 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

14.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

25.1%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.4%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.5%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.3%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Rutherford College, North Carolina (ZIP 28671) lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,262nd) and the top 27% of North Carolina (212th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and binge drinking settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 3.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled hearing disability sits in the top 0.6% nationally, coronary heart disease rests in the top 1.9% nationally, and pfas is in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the top 4.7% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 28605, about 25 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.8%38.3–47.2
High blood pressure among adults48.7%43.6–53.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults17.0%15.1–19.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults11.9%9.8–14.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%7.8–13.2
Depression among adults21.5%18.1–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%12.3–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.4%39.5–49.1
Obesity among adults29.5%22.8–36.8
Stroke among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%18.7–27.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.3–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.4%85.0–89.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.3%84.7–89.4
Cholesterol screening among adults93.0%91.7–94.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.0%70.7–79.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.6%71.6–77.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%72.9–85.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.4%7.6–11.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%7.6–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%21.4–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults25.1%20.0–31.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%15.8–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.3–14.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%11.9–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%9.9–15.0
Any disability among adults40.9%34.5–46.9
Hearing disability among adults14.5%12.2–16.9
Independent living disability among adults9.6%7.3–12.6
Mobility disability among adults21.9%17.0–27.0
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.4–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.0%4.6–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.0%14.6–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.0–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%4.5–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.2–6.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.8–5.9
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.1–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%2.9–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6435.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription86.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)1.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate55.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households70.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+35.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age61.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$73,929$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$317,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured