Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27844

in Hollister, North CarolinaPopulation 3,334

23.69/ 100

Ranked #31,594 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.5%)

Ranked #793 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

14.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.1%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

35.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

23.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

29.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.5%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

21.3%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Overall, Hollister, North Carolina (ZIP 27844) lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally (31,594th) and the bottom 0.2% of North Carolina (793rd).

continue reading

On the ground, a handful of readings define this area: modeled vision disability rests in the top 0.8% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 0.4% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 1.1% nationally, diabetes is in the top 0.8% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 1.4% nationally, cognitive disability registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and transportation rests in the top 1.6% nationally.

For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 27549, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. The ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 85.7; chronic-disease standing 0.9 (bottom 1%) — 85 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #287 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%33.8–40.2
High blood pressure among adults51.2%48.0–55.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.9
Current asthma among adults14.6%13.2–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults11.8%10.8–12.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.4%12.9–16.1
Depression among adults24.5%21.8–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.9%21.7–26.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.5–44.1
Obesity among adults46.3%40.0–53.9
Stroke among adults7.8%7.2–8.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years35.3%31.2–39.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.9%13.8–18.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%78.3–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%79.4–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%83.1–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.1%55.7–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.1%43.0–49.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%64.0–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%9.3–13.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.8%24.8–31.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.3%36.0–45.6
Short sleep duration among adults41.8%36.4–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.5%34.1–41.2
Frequent mental distress among adults21.6%19.7–24.0
Frequent physical distress among adults21.7%19.7–24.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.5%21.4–26.0
Any disability among adults50.1%46.1–54.7
Hearing disability among adults12.5%11.4–13.9
Independent living disability among adults17.1%15.5–18.9
Mobility disability among adults29.6%26.9–32.6
Self-care disability among adults9.7%8.9–10.7
Vision disability among adults14.0%12.8–15.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.3%27.7–35.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.8%36.9–44.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults38.1%34.2–42.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.5%24.5–30.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults21.3%19.2–23.5
Loneliness among adults37.8%33.3–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.7–23.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)31.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)11.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription64.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$39,076$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$105,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$758$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured