Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27350

in Sophia, North CarolinaPopulation 5,882

47.95/ 100

Ranked #18,975 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #465 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #24 of 41 Greensboro-High Point, NC ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.8%

in the bottom 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sophia, North Carolina (ZIP 27350), overall, ranks in the bottom 41% nationally (18,975th) and the bottom 41% of North Carolina (465th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 13.9% nationally. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled radon stands in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and homeownership rests in the top 19% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas registers in the top 9.3% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes settles in the top 18% nationally, and modeled tooth loss is in the top 16% nationally. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 27205, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greensboro-High Point, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.6–34.8
High blood pressure among adults39.4%35.2–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.3–10.9
Depression among adults27.2%23.4–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%34.9–43.9
Obesity among adults39.3%31.8–47.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%16.9–24.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%9.0–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.5–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%75.9–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.6–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.3–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.6%56.7–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%69.3–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.4–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.8–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.0–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%27.3–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%19.1–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.8–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.7–18.9
Any disability among adults36.0%31.6–40.7
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.4–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.9–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.3–14.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.5–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.6–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)15.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate89.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population7.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+21.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age50.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$69,306$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$183,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,041$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured