ZIP code
26866
in Upper Tract, West VirginiaPopulation 989
42.52/ 100
Ranked #24,801 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranked #106 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 15%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Tooth loss
29.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
46.9%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
2.6%
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST16thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
80%
in the top 4.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST42ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Recreation access
1.3 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Park land
27.7%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
47.3%
in the top 7.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST52ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
14.8 mi
in the top 8.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST81stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.2%
in the top 8.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST60thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
10.5%
in the bottom 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS10thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
Upper Tract, West Virginia (ZIP 26866), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 23% nationally (24,801st) and the top 15% of West Virginia (106th).
Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 4.2% nationally, modeled tree cover stands in the top 4.9% nationally, and recreation lands in the top 5.0% nationally. Park land is in the top 5.2% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 8.2% nationally. By contrast, modeled tooth loss lies in the top 3.6% nationally, and high cholesterol sits in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 7.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the top 8.3% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 26807, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 74%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 75%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 25%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 15%
8%
Disability
healthier than 24%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 82%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 84%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 87%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 89%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 98%
8%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 67%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 54%
21%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
26802
West Virginiashares a border
Score 34.33
Closest healthier
26807
West Virginiashares a border
Score 43.64
Similar health profile
25971
West Virginia99% similar profile
Score 41.52
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 41.8% | 37.5–45.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.3% | 42.4–51.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.8% | 10.6–13.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.4% | 10.0–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.2% | 8.7–11.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.1% | 9.1–13.3 |
| Depression among adults | 27.7% | 23.7–31.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.0% | 14.4–19.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.9% | 42.2–51.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.6% | 27.8–43.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 4.0–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 29.2% | 24.3–34.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.8% | 5.8–10.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.7% | 79.8–85.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.5% | 79.2–85.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.2% | 87.4–91.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.3% | 64.3–73.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 54.8% | 50.9–58.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.7% | 66.6–81.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.2% | 10.7–15.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.2% | 14.6–21.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.2% | 26.0–38.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.0% | 33.0–47.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 25.1% | 20.8–29.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.4% | 15.9–20.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.6% | 14.9–20.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.8% | 14.1–19.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.5% | 33.8–44.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.5% | 9.1–12.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.5–12.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.1% | 16.7–23.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.8–5.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.7–6.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.4% | 18.6–26.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 10.0–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.5% | 10.5–16.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 7.9–11.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 6.0–8.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.6% | 27.6–37.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 7.0–10.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 9.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 80.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 2.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 57.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 24.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 47.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | $92,378 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | $209,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | $777 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.1 yr ± 1.44 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.44 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured