Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26591

in Worthington, West VirginiaPopulation 1,568

34.18/ 100

Ranked #29,668 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranked #368 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.76 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

77.3%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST37th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.76 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.1%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

58.6%

in the bottom 10.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.5%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Worthington, West Virginia (ZIP 26591), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 7.5% nationally (29,668th) and the bottom 47% of West Virginia (368th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: childcare sits in the top 4.4% nationally, modeled tree cover registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and civic lands in the top 6.8% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled obesity settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and cognitive disability stands in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the top 8.9% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 10.1% nationally.

In everyday language, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 26431, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.6%36.1–43.3
High blood pressure among adults45.3%41.2–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Depression among adults32.2%28.3–36.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.2%39.0–47.5
Obesity among adults45.8%39.4–52.3
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.5%18.1–25.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.2–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.6–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.9–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.7–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.6%54.1–62.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%50.0–57.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%69.6–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.2–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.5%20.2–26.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%30.2–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults42.1%36.6–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%24.9–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults23.3%20.9–25.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.7–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%18.3–23.1
Any disability among adults41.0%36.6–45.7
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Independent living disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.9
Mobility disability among adults20.5%18.0–23.2
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.2–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.7–22.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.0–26.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.6–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Loneliness among adults34.1%29.7–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6418.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription80.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households59.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age30.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$61,071$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$124,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$739$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured