ZIP code
26435
in Simpson, West VirginiaPopulation 87
31.31/ 100
Ranked #30,474 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.0%)
Ranked #475 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
23%
in the top 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
44.8%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
27%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST69thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
13.4%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Simpson, West Virginia (ZIP 26435) stands in the bottom 5.0% nationally (30,474th) and the bottom 32% of West Virginia (475th).
A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 2.4% nationally, and short sleep rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lands in the top 5.2% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 5.5% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles at the national minimum. Poverty rests at the national minimum, homeownership lands at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum.
Set beside the wider area around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 26347, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 64%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 19%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 1%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 12%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 36%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 76%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 65%
16%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 45%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 14%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 13%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
26347
West Virginiashares a border
Score 36.01
Closest healthier
26354
West Virginiaabout 0.8 mi away
Score 35.88
Similar health profile
24849
West Virginia100% similar profile
Score 33.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.4% | 32.7–40.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.5% | 38.0–47.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.7% | 6.8–8.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.8% | 12.1–15.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.4% | 6.4–8.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.3% | 10.0–14.8 |
| Depression among adults | 33.0% | 28.4–37.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.5% | 13.3–17.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.8% | 37.0–46.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 44.0% | 35.9–52.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.1% | 3.5–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 27.0% | 22.8–31.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.2% | 7.8–15.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.9% | 72.5–79.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.8% | 73.8–81.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.0% | 79.7–86.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.5% | 57.4–67.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 51.0% | 47.1–55.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.8% | 64.3–79.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.1% | 12.4–18.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 25.2% | 20.0–30.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.1% | 30.7–43.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 44.8% | 37.6–52.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.9% | 24.8–35.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 24.2% | 21.2–27.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.6% | 16.7–22.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 23.0% | 19.2–27.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.2% | 36.0–48.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.7% | 6.6–9.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.4% | 11.0–15.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.1% | 16.7–23.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.6–6.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.0% | 5.8–8.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.4% | 21.7–31.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 22.5% | 17.2–28.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 25.6% | 19.7–31.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.5% | 13.1–20.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.2% | 9.9–14.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.5% | 29.8–41.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 14.7% | 12.1–17.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 14.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 73.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 41.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.4 yr ± 1.29 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured