Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26385

in Lost Creek, West VirginiaPopulation 2,870

43.37/ 100

Ranked #24,035 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #88 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 12.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

8.2%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.9%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

3.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.0%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

38.3%

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US71st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lost Creek, West Virginia (ZIP 26385), overall, ranks in the bottom 25% nationally (24,035th) and the top 12.7% of West Virginia (88th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, childcare lies in the top 7.4% nationally, and civic stands in the top 10.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 11.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 12.6% nationally. Homeownership settles in the top 12.8% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Pharmacy sits in the top 14.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 7.2% nationally.

Defined simply, distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 26408, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.0–42.1
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.1–47.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%8.9–11.9
Depression among adults29.4%25.1–34.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.2–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.9%38.9–48.6
Obesity among adults39.8%32.4–47.3
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.8–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.6–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.2–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.1–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%64.9–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.2%55.7–62.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%68.9–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%10.7–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%16.0–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.2%25.3–35.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%33.2–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%20.8–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.7–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.4–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%15.7–20.6
Any disability among adults36.6%31.8–41.8
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.0–20.2
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.0–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.9–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.8–18.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.2–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.8–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.2–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)13.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate92.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$82,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$165,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,081$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured