Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26203

in Erbacon, West VirginiaPopulation 312

34.36/ 100

Ranked #29,599 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranked #358 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

20%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

91.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

20.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

20.8 mi

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$26,343

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.7%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.4%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.8%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Erbacon, West Virginia (ZIP 26203) lands in the bottom 7.7% nationally (29,599th) and the bottom 49% of West Virginia (358th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: crowded housing registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and household income sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 4.0% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 8.4% nationally. Better still, modeled tree cover settles in the top 1.0% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, home broadband subscription runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 26610, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.9%40.1–45.9
High blood pressure among adults47.7%44.5–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%10.0–11.7
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.5–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%9.3–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
Depression among adults30.9%27.9–34.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.8%16.0–19.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.2%41.9–48.6
Obesity among adults41.2%35.8–47.1
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%16.8–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%7.3–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.7–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%79.1–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%59.8–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.0%50.3–56.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%65.5–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.5–24.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.6%33.3–42.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%35.3–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.8%25.4–32.6
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%19.0–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults19.4%17.4–21.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.3–22.0
Any disability among adults43.2%39.3–47.5
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Independent living disability among adults12.3%10.9–14.0
Mobility disability among adults22.4%19.9–25.2
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.6–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%14.1–20.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.2%15.7–22.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.4–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.6–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.5–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)46.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription20.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate76.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)20.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households85.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+24.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age60.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$26,343$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$9,999$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured