Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26056

in New Manchester, West VirginiaPopulation 233

39.37/ 100

Ranked #27,156 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #173 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #20 of 31 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

13.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

69.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.2%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST26th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, New Manchester, West Virginia (ZIP 26056) lands in the bottom 15% nationally (27,156th) and the top 25% of West Virginia (173rd).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: crowded housing lies in the top 2.9% nationally, modeled pfas stands in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 4.1% nationally. On the better side, poverty resides at the national minimum, and homeownership settles at the national maximum. Floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 7.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 26034, about 1.1 miles away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.8%36.7–44.9
High blood pressure among adults46.7%42.0–51.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.0–11.3
Current asthma among adults12.5%10.9–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%9.5–13.6
Depression among adults30.2%26.0–34.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%14.5–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.8%39.1–48.6
Obesity among adults45.2%37.3–52.8
Stroke among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.5%12.6–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%5.6–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%77.9–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%78.9–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.5–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.1–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.4%49.5–57.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.0%57.9–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%10.9–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.9%16.9–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%26.9–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%32.6–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%22.0–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%17.8–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%15.7–21.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%15.2–21.2
Any disability among adults39.3%34.0–45.1
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.0–12.6
Mobility disability among adults19.5%16.4–23.1
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.1–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%11.5–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.6%12.7–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.1–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults31.7%26.7–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.4–12.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households85.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$54,286$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$85,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured