Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25678

in Matewan, West VirginiaPopulation 1,336

19.01/ 100

Ranked #31,934 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranked #668 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Independent-living disability

16.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

48.5%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

24.3%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.3%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.4%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

26.4%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.7%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

In its overall standing, Matewan, West Virginia (ZIP 25678) lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally (31,934th) and the bottom 4.2% of West Virginia (668th).

continue reading

Reading the data plainly, a few things define this area first: modeled independent living disability sits in the top 1.5% nationally, short sleep lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 1.5% nationally, tooth loss rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 2.2% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 3.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 2.3% nationally.

On the overall standing, ZIP 25651, just across the boundary, ranks healthier. In the round, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.2%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 58.3; chronic-disease standing 0.5 (bottom 1%) — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,899 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.0%40.0–47.8
High blood pressure among adults51.3%46.5–55.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.0–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults11.7%10.4–12.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults17.2%15.2–19.2
Depression among adults34.8%30.3–39.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.4%18.8–23.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.7%41.9–51.3
Obesity among adults45.1%36.8–53.5
Stroke among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.3%26.8–35.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.2–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.2–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.6–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.3–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.1–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.7%40.7–48.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%61.4–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%9.7–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults29.9%26.2–33.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.5%39.6–51.1
Short sleep duration among adults48.5%41.5–55.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.7%32.5–40.8
Frequent mental distress among adults24.9%22.2–27.6
Frequent physical distress among adults23.6%20.9–26.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.3%21.5–27.1
Any disability among adults50.7%45.4–55.6
Hearing disability among adults11.2%9.9–12.4
Independent living disability among adults16.2%14.4–18.1
Mobility disability among adults27.4%24.2–30.5
Self-care disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.3–28.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.9%23.0–31.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults33.2%28.8–37.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.3–20.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
Loneliness among adults35.3%30.2–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.9–19.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6415.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)30.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)26.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle14.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate60.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households73.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+30.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age52.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$36,486$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$96,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$396$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.5 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured