Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24150

in Ripplemead, VirginiaPopulation 883

48.93/ 100

Ranked #17,768 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #515 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #24 of 28 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

93.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

64%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

34.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

72.7%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.5%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.96%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

8.9%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

41.9 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ripplemead, Virginia (ZIP 24150), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 45% nationally (17,768th) and the bottom 41% of Virginia (515th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: poverty stands in the top 4.7% nationally, home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 8.6% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled tree cover resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and childcare sits in the top 0.9% nationally. Park land stands in the top 1.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 12.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 24124, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.4%30.7–38.1
High blood pressure among adults42.6%38.2–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.1–10.8
Depression among adults23.9%20.4–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.1–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%38.9–48.1
Obesity among adults36.5%28.6–44.7
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.2–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.9–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.3–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.6–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.4–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.7–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.8–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.6–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.3–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.4–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%23.1–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.2–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.4–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.8–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.6–17.8
Any disability among adults36.7%31.8–41.5
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.5–20.7
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.5–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.8–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription72.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate91.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households57.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+38.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age58.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$62,031$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$113,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured