Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24079

in Copper Hill, VirginiaPopulation 1,389

52.77/ 100

Ranked #12,410 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #349 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #10 of 28 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

1.5%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.23%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.7%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

48.9 mi

in the top 12.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Copper Hill, Virginia (ZIP 24079), overall, ranks in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,410th) and the top 40% of Virginia (349th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: poverty sits in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and childcare lands in the top 6.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Civic registers in the top 9.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 12.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 13.8% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 10.2% nationally.

Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 24059, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.8 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 29.7 — 66 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,319 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.0–38.4
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.5–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Depression among adults24.1%20.7–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.3–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.1%38.6–47.5
Obesity among adults34.0%27.1–41.6
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.6–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.4–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.6–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.3–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%64.0–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%62.5–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%68.7–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%12.9–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.1–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.1–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.2–23.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.9–17.0
Any disability among adults33.9%29.5–38.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Mobility disability among adults17.2%14.7–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.9–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.0–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.2–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.5
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.0–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6414.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription82.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate72.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households66.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,292$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$227,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured