Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24055

in Bassett, VirginiaPopulation 11,814

36.10/ 100

Ranked #28,948 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)

Ranked #835 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mobility disability

23.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

67.9%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.5%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58.3%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bassett, Virginia (ZIP 24055), overall, ranks in the bottom 9.8% nationally (28,948th) and the bottom 4.4% of Virginia (835th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: grocery settles in the top 5.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled mobility disability is in the top 5.6% nationally, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled tooth loss lands in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 6.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability rests in the top 7.1% nationally, and diabetes registers in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled self-care disability resides in the top 8.5% nationally, and pfas settles in the top 8.6% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 24078, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $45,227 predicts 76.9 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,582 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%34.2–41.2
High blood pressure among adults46.1%42.0–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.5–11.3
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.5–14.3
Depression among adults25.5%21.9–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%16.1–20.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%39.4–47.8
Obesity among adults41.9%34.8–49.3
Stroke among adults5.7%5.3–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.4%21.6–29.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.8%10.0–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.2–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%59.9–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.5%52.0–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%62.7–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.1–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.2%17.6–22.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.8%30.2–39.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%32.3–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.0%25.9–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.0–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%17.5–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.4–21.5
Any disability among adults42.9%38.5–47.3
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.0
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.7–14.3
Mobility disability among adults23.6%21.1–26.2
Self-care disability among adults6.5%6.0–7.2
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.4–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.6–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.3%17.9–22.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.5–22.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Loneliness among adults33.7%29.7–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)21.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription67.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate76.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+28.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age50.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$45,227$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$125,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$580$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured