Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23937

in Drakes Branch, VirginiaPopulation 1,915

38.49/ 100

Ranked #27,726 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.6%)

Ranked #800 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

52.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.5%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

19.8 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

16.7 mi

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.7%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Drakes Branch, Virginia (ZIP 23937), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 13.6% nationally (27,726th) and the bottom 8.4% of Virginia (800th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: grocery settles in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 6.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled stroke rests in the top 4.1% nationally, modeled diabetes sits in the top 4.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 5.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lies in the top 7.4% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 7.9% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 23923, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.8; chronic-disease standing 5.4 (bottom 10%) — 77 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #632 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%33.0–39.5
High blood pressure among adults46.6%42.8–50.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.6–13.1
Depression among adults23.8%20.7–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.5%17.5–21.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%39.0–47.1
Obesity among adults43.7%36.5–51.4
Stroke among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.9%16.9–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%9.9–13.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.6–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.8–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%85.0–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%63.4–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.7%53.3–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%68.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.6–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.5%17.1–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%30.0–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%35.1–47.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.0%25.9–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.0–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.8–20.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.9–21.0
Any disability among adults42.3%38.2–46.7
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.6
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.0
Mobility disability among adults23.5%21.0–26.0
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%21.3–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.6%19.9–25.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.6%19.9–25.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.3–18.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Loneliness among adults34.7%30.1–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)29.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle9.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription72.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$42,818$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$85,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,050$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured