Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23666

in Hampton, VirginiaPopulation 54,233

52.55/ 100

Ranked #12,696 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #357 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #70 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

658 units

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.8%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.9%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

93.8%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

39.8%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

97 intersections/sq mi

in the top 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 23666, one of several in Hampton, Virginia lands in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,696th) and the top 41% of Virginia (357th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 3.1% nationally, lead in tap water is at the national minimum, and modeled mammography sits in the top 2.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers lies in the top 7.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled short sleep stands in the top 4.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the top 10.3% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. On the overall standing, ZIP 23601, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $72,568 predicts 78.8 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,645 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.2–30.0
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.5–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Depression among adults20.7%17.7–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.9–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.4–40.2
Obesity among adults39.5%33.4–46.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.2–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.2–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.9–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.6–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.2–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.4–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.7%77.4–87.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%10.8–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%11.8–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%22.3–30.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.8%38.7–49.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.5–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.5–18.1
Any disability among adults35.2%31.4–39.5
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%22.5–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.5–21.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.4–18.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.8–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.2–11.7
Loneliness among adults36.9%31.8–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate52.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households43.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age36.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,568$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$253,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,541$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.51 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured