Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23509

in Norfolk, VirginiaPopulation 13,105

49.29/ 100

Ranked #17,255 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #498 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #99 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

24.9%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.1%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

37.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

7.1%

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 23509, one of several in Norfolk, Virginia ranks in the bottom 46% nationally (17,255th) and the bottom 43% of Virginia (498th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 1.6% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled loneliness rests in the top 9.1% nationally. On the stronger side, walkability is in the top 4.4% nationally, lead in tap water stands at the national minimum, and modeled mammography settles in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled radon lies in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 23502, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.9 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $72,816 predicts 78.8 years — 5.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,728 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.9 ± 1.6 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.2 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,568 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.2–30.2
High blood pressure among adults41.0%37.1–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Depression among adults21.2%18.1–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.3–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.8–41.6
Obesity among adults42.0%35.7–47.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.9%11.5–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.0–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.9–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.4–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.4–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.6%59.3–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.1%76.6–86.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.7–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%23.9–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%36.0–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.7–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.9–18.6
Any disability among adults34.7%30.8–38.6
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Mobility disability among adults17.1%15.2–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.7–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%18.0–23.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.8–21.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.5–19.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Loneliness among adults37.9%33.3–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.4–13.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate62.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population7.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households44.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,816$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$258,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,326$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.9 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 72.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured