Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23175

in Urbanna, VirginiaPopulation 2,053

53.69/ 100

Ranked #11,096 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #314 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

9.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.52 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.52 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

26.1 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.2%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.52 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Urbanna, Virginia (ZIP 23175) lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,096th) and the top 36% of Virginia (314th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: transit is in the top 1.3% nationally, grocery sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and childcare lands in the top 2.1% nationally. Pharmacy lies in the top 4.7% nationally, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 4.4% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the top 7.8% nationally. On the other side, distance to a community health center settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol is in the top 3.8% nationally.

Put simply, distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. On the overall standing, ZIP 23149, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.5; chronic-disease standing 15.0 — 65 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,421 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.2–42.2
High blood pressure among adults45.4%40.9–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults21.4%18.2–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.3–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.3%40.5–50.2
Obesity among adults38.1%30.3–46.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.5–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.8–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.2%81.4–86.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.6%81.7–87.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.3–92.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.2%69.6–78.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.0%65.6–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.0–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.3–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%10.9–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.3–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%28.4–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.8–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.5–15.1
Any disability among adults36.0%31.4–40.7
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.3–21.5
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.3–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.0–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.7–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.0–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households77.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+40.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age61.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$66,858$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$369,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$924$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured