ZIP code
23108
in Mascot, VirginiaPopulation 22
47.77/ 100
Ranked #19,226 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)
Ranked #557 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranked #67 of 93 Richmond, VA ZIPs (bottom 28%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
45.1%
in the top 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.5%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 7.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS8thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
20.2 mi
in the top 8.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, Mascot, Virginia (ZIP 23108) sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,226th) and the bottom 36% of Virginia (557th).
A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 3.6% nationally, high cholesterol stands in the top 4.2% nationally, and hearing disability resides in the top 6.5% nationally. On the stronger side, housing-cost burden sits at the national minimum, modeled transportation noise stands at the national minimum, and poverty resides at the national minimum. Homeownership sits at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.
Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 23032, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Richmond, VA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 83%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 66%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 67%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Disability
healthier than 24%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 33%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 78%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 84%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 44%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 22%
21%
Disability
healthier than 28%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 18%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 45%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 23%
13%
Disability
healthier than 15%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 25%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
23032
Virginiashares a border
Score 50.43
Closest healthier
23079
Virginialess than 0.1 mi away
Score 50.31
Similar health profile
78885
Texas95% similar profile
Score 45.91
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.4% | 32.3–40.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 45.9% | 41.1–50.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.5% | 10.3–12.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.0–11.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.2% | 9.7–13.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.5% | 8.6–12.8 |
| Depression among adults | 21.9% | 18.3–25.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.8% | 14.3–19.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.1% | 40.3–49.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.0% | 29.7–46.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.1% | 4.4–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.8% | 10.3–15.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.4% | 6.8–12.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.0% | 79.0–84.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.2% | 77.7–84.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.1% | 85.7–90.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.1% | 60.8–71.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.5% | 55.9–63.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.7% | 68.3–82.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.3% | 10.8–16.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.9% | 12.6–19.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.3% | 22.8–34.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.0% | 29.4–43.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.2% | 19.1–28.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.7% | 13.5–18.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.7% | 14.2–19.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.3% | 12.8–18.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.3% | 32.8–44.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.5% | 10.0–13.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.2% | 7.7–11.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.6% | 16.1–23.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.1–5.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.0% | 5.1–7.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.7% | 16.9–24.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 9.6–16.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.0% | 8.2–14.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 7.6–11.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.4% | 5.9–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.8% | 26.5–37.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | VA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 26.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855 |
| Population 65+ | 100.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | VA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.1 yr ± 1.96 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.96 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured