Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22427

in Bowling Green, VirginiaPopulation 4,356

50.80/ 100

Ranked #15,141 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #432 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.6%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bowling Green, Virginia (ZIP 22427), by its composite score, sits in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,141st) and the top 49% of Virginia (432nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: pharmacy stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and grocery registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Outpatient settles in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover lies in the top 12.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 19% nationally. Pulling the other way, slow internet speeds is in the top 4.5% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 16% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 16% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 22408, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%26.9–33.8
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.4–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.0–8.9
Depression among adults22.0%18.5–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.0–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.5–44.6
Obesity among adults41.1%32.6–49.7
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.3–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.5–13.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.7–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%75.8–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.9–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.8–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.1%59.8–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.5–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.3–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.3–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%32.2–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%19.3–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.1–17.8
Any disability among adults35.1%30.6–39.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.4
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%20.6–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%13.9–18.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.7–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Loneliness among adults35.4%30.2–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6411.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate59.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households41.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$81,488$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$315,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$978$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured