Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21849

in Parsonsburg, MarylandPopulation 3,388

52.62/ 100

Ranked #12,591 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #349 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #11 of 24 Salisbury, MD ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.63 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

35.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56.7%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.4%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

1.2%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

79%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Parsonsburg, Maryland (ZIP 21849), by its composite score, sits in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,591st) and the bottom 24% of Maryland (349th).

continue reading

Where the data is kindest to this area, a few readings lead the way: childcare registers in the top 6.5% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Park land lies in the top 18% nationally. On the other hand, fatal road crashes rests in the top 9.3% nationally, modeled pfas resides in the top 9.5% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol is in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 14.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 15% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 19966, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salisbury, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%30.3–35.5
High blood pressure among adults38.9%36.1–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Depression among adults22.5%20.0–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%40.4–46.4
Obesity among adults38.7%34.4–43.1
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.3–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.3–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.7–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.9–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%88.0–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%65.6–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%57.0–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.3–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.4–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.8–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.2%24.8–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%28.9–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.5–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.9–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.8–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.5–15.8
Any disability among adults29.7%26.6–33.0
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.5–17.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.6–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.7–13.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.9–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.9–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription79.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate76.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households60.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$71,211$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$249,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,200$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured