Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21824

in Ewell, MarylandPopulation 264

43.12/ 100

Ranked #24,264 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #438 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranked #23 of 24 Salisbury, MD ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

99.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

60.2%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

24.6 mi

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

23.7 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.5%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.4 mi

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9.2 mi

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ewell, Maryland (ZIP 21824), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 24% nationally (24,264th) and the bottom 4.4% of Maryland (438th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: floodplain exposure lies in the top 0.2% nationally, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 3.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers in the top 6.9% nationally. More positively, modeled transportation noise stands at the national minimum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 3.4% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 7.4% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 23440, about 7.8 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salisbury, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%33.1–40.4
High blood pressure among adults43.3%39.4–47.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.4%10.2–12.7
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%8.7–12.9
Depression among adults24.0%20.7–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%39.1–47.4
Obesity among adults34.4%28.4–40.9
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.1–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.3–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.3–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.4–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.4–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.5–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.8%53.2–60.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.0–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%13.8–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%26.3–37.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%31.8–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%18.9–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.4–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.3–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.3–18.7
Any disability among adults35.2%30.3–41.0
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.9
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.3–12.0
Mobility disability among adults18.5%15.4–22.2
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.8–5.7
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.8–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.0–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.0–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.4%10.3–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.7–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–9.0
Loneliness among adults32.6%27.8–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)33.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)1.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription60.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate75.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+29.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$90,288$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$108,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 2.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured