Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21750

in Hancock, MarylandPopulation 3,417

45.32/ 100

Ranked #22,079 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #423 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranked #22 of 28 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.7%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

11 mi

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

26.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.8%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US76th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$60,625

in the bottom 30% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US30th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Hancock, Maryland (ZIP 21750) sits in the bottom 31% nationally (22,079th) and the bottom 7.7% of Maryland (423rd).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: grocery lands in the top 1.3% nationally, pharmacy resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the top 8.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 12.5% nationally, and physicians is in the top 13.2% nationally. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon registers in the top 9.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 17% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 17236, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.4%32.9–37.9
High blood pressure among adults42.0%39.3–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.4–12.1
Depression among adults24.9%22.3–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.3–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%36.0–41.5
Obesity among adults39.8%35.9–43.9
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%13.0–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.8–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.8–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.3–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%61.2–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.0%55.2–60.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%69.2–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%11.4–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.3–20.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.9%28.6–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%35.9–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.8–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.9–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.6–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
Any disability among adults35.4%32.3–38.7
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.0%15.1–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.9–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.0–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.5–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.1–9.1
Loneliness among adults34.0%30.6–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate73.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households64.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age50.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$60,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$232,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$983$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured