Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19970

in Ocean View, DelawarePopulation 8,524

58.72/ 100

Ranked #5,814 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #22 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

53.5%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

25.4%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.5%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

72%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Ocean View, Delaware (ZIP 19970) stands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,814th) and the top 34% of Delaware (22nd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and utility shutoff settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, short sleep lands in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and binge drinking settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 4.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 0.06% nationally, and pfas settles in the top 3.9% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 19930, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby. Beyond the headline readings, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 1.6 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #593 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 88.3; chronic-disease standing 11.8 — 77 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #677 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.7%36.2–43.3
High blood pressure among adults47.4%43.4–51.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.5%14.1–16.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.0–10.8
Depression among adults19.4%16.6–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.9–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened53.5%49.3–57.5
Obesity among adults31.2%25.8–36.8
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%7.0–10.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.9–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.1%84.8–89.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.0%84.6–89.0
Cholesterol screening among adults93.3%92.2–94.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.2%73.7–80.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.1%66.9–73.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.7%76.9–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%9.1–12.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.5–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.4–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults27.5%23.5–32.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.4–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.7%8.4–11.1
Any disability among adults31.0%27.1–34.7
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.1
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.5–19.0
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults15.7%13.3–18.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.1–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Loneliness among adults25.4%22.1–28.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.2–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–649.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription93.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate91.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population4.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households84.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+48.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age63.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$94,103$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$526,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,512$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured