Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19717

in Newark, DelawarePopulation 6,036

48.92/ 100

Ranked #17,769 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #43 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #296 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

14.4%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

13.6%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.0%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

2.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

25.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.70%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.2%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

46.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

4.7%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 19717, one of several in Newark, Delaware, overall, ranks in the bottom 45% nationally (17,769th) and the bottom 33% of Delaware (43rd).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 0.8% nationally, slow internet speeds lands at the national maximum, and modeled loneliness lies in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the top 2.4% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 6.4% nationally. On the better side, modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and hearing disability resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 19711, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.8%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 18.7; chronic-disease standing 98.9 (top 10%) — 80 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,206 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults5.4%4.5–6.3
High blood pressure among adults13.6%11.5–15.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.8%0.7–0.9
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
Coronary heart disease among adults1.0%0.9–1.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.8%2.2–3.4
Depression among adults30.8%26.8–34.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults2.1%1.8–2.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened14.4%12.2–16.7
Obesity among adults28.2%23.1–33.7
Stroke among adults0.7%0.6–0.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.6–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.2–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure20.9%17.4–24.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.0%65.4–74.2
Cholesterol screening among adults64.3%59.8–68.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.1–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.5%47.7–55.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%64.4–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%16.6–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.1%7.1–11.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%19.0–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.6–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%14.5–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults28.2%24.8–31.6
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%8.3–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults25.8%22.2–29.7
Any disability among adults34.4%29.8–39.3
Hearing disability among adults2.2%1.9–2.6
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.1–15.4
Mobility disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.7
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.7–2.4
Vision disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.6%21.7–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.8%22.2–33.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.7%18.8–30.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.7%15.1–21.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.6%16.3–22.5
Loneliness among adults46.4%41.3–51.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.5–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population7.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age19.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured